This thread seems to have settled into a "which Vans" debate!
Although I am a great fan of Composite construction,there are a number of drawbacks.
Build-conditions, temperature and humidity need accurate control. surgical cleanliness is also a prerequisite. a wipe with a rag is NOT "clean" !
Damage can remain hidden until structural failure. We all know of the phantom hangar rash appearance...but if it doesn't show.......
Operating conditions.....Composites don't take kindly to sitting for hours in a strong, hot sun.
Repairs need a skill and experience-level hard to find...or a dedicated person willing to learn on the job....Your job!
Vans is orthodox construction, proven track-record,good resale value and provided it's properly corrosion-proofed at build and properly put together, will outlive the builder comfortably.
Damage is usually self-evident!
Err....guess I'd build a Vans! (very impressed with the recent AD's and the quality of the construction and components.)