Originally Posted by
FE Hoppy
You might have dedicated 5 posts but you proved nothing.
Insert waypoint at 07. Approaching boundary sync and select heading(incase you failed to make the waypoint a flyover).
After waypoint faint right then shortly afterwards when you think you are out of range turn left.
All the time you have your next waypoint in view for reference.
Prove that what I have written is "Impossible"!
I already answered this objection.
Why should you insert VAMPI as next waypoint at or before 1:07 in first place if you plan to turn 40° right after IGARI? Where is the rationale? You change your flight plan in your FMC just to override it? What for? Just to leave a trace of your foul play in the ACARS log? Makes no sense.
The sequence you describe is absolutely possible itself, still does not explain the behavior of the aircraft BEFORE 1:21 MYT. The right turn is a clear indication the aircraft was still following its original flight plan at the time it disappeared from radar, therefore next waypoint BITOD, not VAMPI.
Note.
I do not and can not rule out foul play by the cockpit AFTER 1:21. It is absolutely possible that the flight plan was changed after 1:21. But I see no evidence that such change was made before 1:21, nor I see any rational explanation as to why it should be programmed more than 10 minutes before, so that it could be reported by ACARS.
Question: have you considered that that report could be simply inaccurate or false?