View Single Post
Old 10th Jan 2014, 06:29
  #190 (permalink)  
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Go west young man
Posts: 1,732
Devil "VH-IOS cleared for pushback!"

Old Akro:
I don't think legislation has much to do with people honouring commitments. The trouble is that there is a culture in CASA that pilots just don't matter.

It didn't used to be like this. I think its 99% about the people & culture and people & culture problems are 99% about the guys at the top.
These problems don't require legislation to fix them. It just requires people with integrity and backbone in the upper levels of CASA.
Nail on head Akro is all about the culture, slay the head first, tackle the culture, several subcultures and then your halfway to fixing the problem...

Supposedly the bureaucrats are meant to be servants of the people, only ever acting in the national & public interest . These interests are meant to be conveyed and overseen by our elected representatives in parliament through government policy and then subsequently through legislation.

Fort Fumble's remit of in the public interest also includes public safety (i.e. aviation safety)and that iswhere the difference between theory & reality manifests itself and the lines become blurred...

The US bureaucrats are still beholden to the public interest but under the US constitution the public interest is clearly defined and made sacrosanct by their Bill of Rights, theUS crats are in no doubt that they are indeed servants of the people...

Ok back to the topics at hand, namely Avmed and to a certain degree the FRMS (CAO 48.1) debate....

The US at the moment also have FRMS & Avmed issues that are currently being debated across the political, public and industry spectrum. Recently Avweb, a US based aviation website which has a readership of close to half a million per month, put out the following article Aviation Gets a Congressional Star Turn (my bold):
If you were paying attention to the news last week, you may have noticed that the otherwise chronically broken Congress actually proposed a bi-partisan budget package. Now letís not delude ourselves into thinking strains of Kumbaya will soon be pealing from the Capitol and the members will be caroling on Pennsylvania Avenue, but this little outbreak of cooperation may have positive consequences for aviation. {boy that sounds familiar but alas we are only talking one house not two}

Specifically and without undue prodding, Congress got busy pushing back on two critical issues, the FAAís plan to require sleep apnea diagnosis for medical certification and the very idea that the Third Class medical requirement is still viable. Itís not unusual for Congress to dip deeply into the affairs of government agencies; thatís what they do, after all. But I canít recall a confluence of Congressional involvement in two important aviation issues occurring so quickly. {unlike the snail's pace of RRP}

First, the proposed sleep apnea diagnosis. Iím surprised that FAA air surgeon Fred Tilton stumbled into this mess. Mid-level agency executives are usually a lot smarter about whatís going to stir up the masses enough to invoke the wrath of Congress {here the midlevel crats thumb their nose at the pollies} . They like to avoid that sort of thing. Yet, by administrative fiat, Tilton decreed in early November that all pilots over a body mass index of 40 would have to be tested for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and that eventually, the agency wants to extend that to lower BMIs. Hereís Tiltonís announcement. (PDF) Itís breathtaking in its potential scope, cost to airmen and utter lack of supporting data demonstrating how aviation safety will be improved or even anything showing that OSA is a threat to aviation safety. Earlier this month, the House introduced a bill to require the FAA to follow standard rulemaking procedures for this proposed new requirement.

What stuns me is that Tilton didnít have his ducks in a row on this, attaching links to convincingly show how OSA is causal in aviation accidents to the extent that itís worth the enormous expense he is proposing to address this issue. Could it be there are no ducks to line up? My guess is the convincing data doesnít exist. Yes, the NTSB has opined (PDF) on this subject, but largely in the context of fatigue in general, with apnea as but one factor. In other words, Tilton may be proposing an expensive fishing trip, to be paid by pilots seeking medicals.

If you break through the crust of all the coverage on sleep apnea, you soon see that it has become the condition du jour, the suddenly discovered silent killer of the masses. How could civilization have endured so long with the scourge of sleep apnea? {love it!} An entire industry to treat it has emerged and doctors are being shown how they can make lots of money in the burgeoning field of ďsleep medicine.Ē In this story, NPR reported that Medicare payments for sleep testing increased nearly four fold between 2001 and 2009, from $62 million to $235 million.

According to the report, a company called Aviisha specializes in sleep testing and lures physicians with a picture of a doctor with a stack of cash in his lab coat pocket. Not to say the sleep medicine business is entirely a racket, but you can see the potential for abuse. I suspect Tiltonís proposal will be seen as playing into this. If Congress forces rulemaking, perhaps weíll get a look at what data is supposed to support how OSA treatment will materially improve aviation safety.

Of course, if there werenít a requirement for medicals, expensive OSA treatments wouldnít be a requirement, either. And thatís the idea behind a bill introduced last week by Rep. Todd Rokita, an Indiana Republican whoís also a pilot. The bill would expand the use of the driverís license medical certification to allow pilots to fly aircraft up to 6000 pounds, VFR in non-commercial operations. It doesnít eliminate the Third Class, but rather reduces the scope of operations where it's required. If passed, itís a huge step forward, but thereís one thing about it I donít like: it doesnít allow IFR operations. This makes no sense to me, for instrument skills and operations have always been seen as a means of improving safety. Itís counter-logical to say that itís medically stressful or that it should require a higher degree of medical screening. My guess is itís thrown into the bill as a bone and Iím not really complaining. We have to start somewhere on eliminating the Third Class and this is a positive development.

But itís not without negatives. While I donít think the elimination or curtailment of the Third Class will kill the light sport industry, it will put a dent in it, especially for some manufacturers. Many LSA buyers are older pilots who have the wherewithal to pay cash for $130,000 airplanes. Some are doing that because theyíre selling their Bonanzas or Skyhawks out of medical-loss fear. They see LSAs as lifeboats to extend their flying career. If fear of medical loss no longer propels them, light sport will lose some sales. So be it. Itís unreasonable to expect light sport to sustain on the back of a medical requirement that has long since outlived its usefulness, if it was ever useful. {love it!}

How these two issues play out will be interesting to watch and will likely be another case study in how bureaucracies protect their castles (troughs!} by maneuvering around Congress. Itís always amusingóor maybe infuriatingóto attend public meetings where FAA mid-level or even administrator-level executives talk the talk about supporting GA and removing regulatory barriers. Yet here are two examples where they are doing just the opposite. Elimination of the Third Class medical wonít instantly stimulate GA growth, but it will surely reduce the erosion of the pilot population, which is the next best thing. Tiltonís sleep apnea proposal is just bizarre.I have little doubt that many pilots on the verge of bailing from GA will be encouraged to do just that when confronted with a requirement for $3000 worth of OSA testing and then living with a CPAP machine. Personally, Iíd rather take up crack smoking than look and sound like Darth Vader when getting ready for bed. But thatís just me. Either way, it ought to be my choice, not the FAAís.
Hopefully for us here in Oz the yanks do get these matters sorted (before they lob as issues here), otherwise the basket case that is our aviation safety administrators will have us all smoking crack before long...

If you want to see the effect of Paul Bertorelli's article on the US IOS membership, you only need refer to some of the many excellent comments that followed...gotta love the yank culture of Loud & Boisterous, not afraid to speak up . Sure beats this secret squirrel cr#p with the WLR fix...


On our Avmed hot topic of controversy i.e. Dr Pape & CVD, the late Laurence Guzman QC letter of interest: More ancient history...#65

Last edited by Sarcs; 10th Jan 2014 at 07:20.
Sarcs is offline