ETflyer, or perhaps a different assessor looked over the application and thought more of it than the initial assessor? Whether it's BA or the FTOs who are vetting the applicants, surely there's got to be a team of people doing it, and thus a level of subjectivity. Perhaps the first time it was assessed immediately after a really strong application, and the second after a particularly poor one, making it look better or worse by comparison. Who knows? I've got no idea precisely how they do it, but it would seem that having two different outcomes for the same application doesn't prove things in either direction, especially considering that the questions don't require yes/no answers.
Ps. You may, of course, be right...but that example doesn't necessarily prove it!
Last edited by MaydayMaydayMayday; 21st Oct 2013 at 08:32.