PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Merged: CASA Regulatory Reform
View Single Post
Old 10th Oct 2013, 12:15
  #205 (permalink)  
Jabawocky
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: in the classroom of life
Age: 55
Posts: 6,864
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Leadie

How about this one;
Recency requirements for Private IFR rating: (61.920) The recency requirements for conducting instrument approach operations have been aligned with the recency requirements specified for an instrument rating. These requirements do not apply to enroute operations.
http://www.casa.gov.au/wcmswr/_asset...iefing-doc.pdf

Not sure if it was you or another poster who often claimed the great advantages and steps forward the PIFR made. Well I use it to keep my CIR recent when my recency gets a bit out.

I thought now that the ATO's are bailing out, including the one I use, that this might help me during the search for another good ATO. It may take a while. But it seems the rest of us non airline guys will be buzzing YBOK on weekends to keep current. Chances of a midair increased x 1000

Sent my FAA paperwork in yesterday so one month when they get back to work I might be one step closer to moving there!

We plane owners make a boat owner look like a genius!
Jabawocky is offline