Hey Kharon,
For the absence of doubt, I am very much in heated agreement with the points you make in #1434, if not the vast majority of your (unlubricated) posts.
The reason that I raise the s24 question is that it seems to be a desperate, shotgun-like attempt to identify a crime, any crime, to demonstrate misfeasance in public office (which, of course, is the real crime being alleged). I much prefer the PPRuNe debates that stay vaguely aligned with the issues, rather than a frenetic search for some psuedo-legal relevance.
I was hoping Creamie might incisely despatch the s24 argument back into the shadows where it belongs...
Stay Alive,