PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - 787 Batteries and Chargers - Part 1
View Single Post
Old 29th Jan 2013, 14:34
  #264 (permalink)  
Lyman
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Grassy Valley
Posts: 2,074
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The landing in TAK (ANA) involved a warning on ECAM. Plus, smell.

SOPS in re: emergency landing would be an interesting discussion. It is a separate issue from the failure of the Battery....

It is in fact the most important issue. WHY? Because nothing about ANA should have caused the a/c to land, the system functioned within FAA RULES.

Likewise UAL, technically even JAL..... Says alot about the rulemaking, imo.

And, the 'legality' of the rules....It is a good foundation for Boeing's theory of defense regarding damages. If they demonstrate the rules were observed, the grounding becomes an unnecessary burden.....

Last edited by Lyman; 29th Jan 2013 at 14:43.
Lyman is offline