The city council this week received a solicitor’s letter, sent on behalf of objector Gordon Brown, demanding that it revisits the decision to grant planning permission. consent has yet to be signed off because one of the conditions set has still to be fulfilled. The letter from Dickinson Dees argues that, where consent has not been confirmed, the council can reconsider its decision if “new material of relevance” comes to light.
The thrust of the letter is that councillors passed what planning officers said was a “finely-balanced” application because they were swayed by Aer Arann’s promise of scheduled passenger flights. The airline wrote in support of Stobart’s scheme, saying it would station a 48-seater ATR42 aircraft at Carlisle to provide twice-daily flights to London Southend and a daily Dublin service.
Dickinson Dees points to Aer Arann’s recent decision to withdraw from Waterford Airport in Ireland. The three routes from Waterford carried 66,756 passengers in the year to October, roughly the same as the projections for passenger numbers from Carlisle. The letter says: “If the 66,756 passengers carried by Aer Arann on the Waterford routes were insufficient to sustain those routes....passenger numbers from Carlisle will not be able to sustain the proposed routes.The cessation of all services at Waterford Airport by Aer Arann is clearly a material consideration.”
The letter warns that, if the council confirms planning consent without taking account of this new information, its decision “would clearly be susceptible to challenge by way of judicial review”.
What there getting at is that in a letter to the council during the planning process, Aer Arann said it expected to carry 40,000 passengers to Southend and 20,000 to Dublin in the first year, so less that the number which was unsustainable at Waterford.
News & Star | Fresh doubts about Carlisle airport redevelopment plans
News & Star | News | Business | Airline shake-up