The original show cause might have specified (a) to (e), inclusive. So what?
269(1A) imposes a constraint only on the decision to cancel, not what grounds may be specified in a show cause notice that might lead to one or more of a variety of regulatory actions, including suspension or cancellation for reasons other than findings of a court. CASA and the AAT needed only one ground, and eventually made and affirmed a decision on the basis of two, neither of which is the ground to which the constraint in 269(1A) applies.
Last edited by Creampuff; 12th Jul 2012 at 21:42.