I forget what it was that started your rabid ranting, Tourist, and frankly can't be bothered to look back and find out. It seems to me that you're trying to defend the need for a carrier at the expense of UKAD. But I didn't think anyone here ever questioned the attractiveness of a carrier AND ALL the supporting assets that go with it.
Perhaps it's just that time of year again when you feel the need to have a bash at a type you've never flown and clearly know very little about.
Anyway, you cheered up an otherwise quiet week with your humorous quips an novel ideas about air defence. Or were you being serious?