PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Another of Genghis' thought experiments - the perfect trainer?
Old 13th May 2012, 18:37
  #11 (permalink)  
Dan the weegie
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Scotland
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There's an updated Aussie PA38 with a low tail but otherwise identical. An up to date version with a more economical engine (not necessarily the rotax!) and perhaps a revised W+B schedule would be ideal.

Basically for it to be a good trainer, it needs to be a reasonable handling beast but should be quite stable in pitch relative to the current LSAs that are quite twitchy in pitch. Light on fuel, the 0-235 is actually pretty good at this, it will almost certainly take UL91 if it's not already cleared for it but the new lightweight conti 0-200 would be a better engine than the rotax for the job of a trainer, I don't believe that reduction gearing is up to the constant hamfisted power changes required for a trainer.

But it just has to be tough, inside and especially the gear. It needs to put up with 800 hours a year of which 600 are circuits. Simple is the key.

Aeros would make it too expensive because the certification process will be more complicated. The simpler the better.

Last edited by Dan the weegie; 13th May 2012 at 18:51.
Dan the weegie is offline