Having been stung a bit [financially as well as in disruptions] in the whole IA mess, was interested to read the entire ET report.
In the bit where the claimant is ordered on one occasion to pay some of BA's counsel's fees and expenses, due to an apparent snafu resulting in some lost court time caused by the claimant's attorneys, it says,
"Accordingly, as the claimant now works full-time for his union, we
order that he pay the respondent's costs in the sum of £4786."
Do they mean the alleged honorarium? Or an actual salaried job?