It was about the principle of imposition
Miss M and others keep on about imposition as a reason for striking.
BA would say that they were "managing" their cabin crew.
I thought that in the subsequent court case the judge came down on the side of BA managing their staff.
Therefore there was no imposition as such, just a group of people not used to their " boss" telling them what they had to do whilst at work.
Isn't it really as simple as that??