Originally Posted by
dalek
JP,
Thank you.
With or without being rude, how can you justify the Gross Negligence verdict without demolishing Sqn Ldr Burke's evidence?
If UFCM / FADEC problems still cannot be ruled out, how can the verdict be justified?
A Happy New Year to you and all the other participants.
dalek,
Due it's toxicity JP simply cannot answer your question as to do so blows his theory clean out of the water.
If he acknowledges Bob Burke's evidence, which is absolutely 100% credible it introduces the very doubt that he assures us does not exist, so you will be ignored.
One or two on here are very very clever at avoiding the subject matter they know they cannot discredit.