JP
You have an 'opinion' based on a scarcity of reliable facts. I have no doubt that will remain your opinion.
My 'opinion', based on the same scarcity of reliable facts, is very different.
It is not possible for us both to have a '
difference of opinion' in cases in which there is 'absolutely no doubt whatsoever'.
Your opinion is not the only possible explanation. Just as my opinion that we could not recover sufficient
facts to say for sure what happened, is not wrong.
We just disagree. That's all.
BTW: I recently viewed a TV program on air accident investigation, in which it was said that 'black boxes' are normally decoded by impartial third parties. In stark contrast to the navigation computer of ZD576 (never previously used to provide historical data!!!) which was of course decoded by it's manufacturer. Whose performance
may of course have been implicated???