Tandemrotor
I asked you to discuss the evidence, but all you have done yet again, is repeated your 'opinion', based on... well, not very much apparently.
The evidence has been chewed to death on this thread with no positive outcome one way or the other. That's why I hold the pragmatist view. I have read it all - both sides - from the beginning and what.....................?
The argument goes on, to what end? There is no new evidence that I know of so you can have a view or not. If you wish not to - well fine - but why knock others that do?
His Lordship will have to make a descision based upon all the evidence available. Why cannot others?