Why wouldn't they? You take a case to the union. If you don't want to, you are not legally compelled to do so. The reasonable person knows if they have wronged.
Exactly. So why aren't BASSA releasing the actual information on the offences that caused dismissal? They prefer insinuation to facts because the facts make the dismissed look guilty.
What possible harm could there be if this really was a big conspiracy against BASSA members? Surely it would strengthen public support. The silence says more than one of Duncans 800 word missives ever could.