But there would no doubt be a representative of the union along with the affected employee at the disciplinary meetings who would be party to the information used. That would then be passed to the membership. The membership would then decide for itself if the decision was unjust. All above board and within the law.
Which therefore begs the question... Why hasn't the information on these dismissals been passed to the membership for their perusal?
Surely if the dismissals were some outrageous campaign against BASSAs membership then the evidence would massively bolster support for them?
A cynic may suggest that the cases that resulted in dismissal went so far beyond the pale that even the BASSA membership would see that justice was served. So by not releasing the details they can continue to insinuate the conspiracy outlined above, even though it's cobblers.