Originally Posted by
vctenderness
However the rules applied equally to all reps and for operational reasons de-roster could be refused for them.
I imagine that if there is no evidence to counter what you say, it is going to be a very short tribunal. It will probably hang on
reasonable time off and whether it could be proved that over time, less time off was allowed because of the dispute. But the mandate not to negotiate is a glaringly big statement, when you are trying to defend time off
to negotiate!