Originally Posted by GGR
IMHO The Army are not bad at letting former RAF buildings fall into dreadful states of repair
Unfortunately, they tend to move us onto your sites as a cost saving; which is not normally associated with an enhanced budget to pay for the upkeep of the buildings. I don't think anybody sits there purposely neglecting the historic value these sites have to the RAF; just the priorities lie elsewhere.
One other point, my opinion based on my experience of working/living on both RAF and Army sites is that the RAF structures and system are geared up to support your stations; I can't say the same for the Army.