Or perhaps having them listed as respondent will get them onto the stand and sworn, surely I do not need to connect the dots for you ?.
I stand by my statement(IMHO) regarding Alan Cook and Peter John, they no doubt had subordinates working for them, wonder what the court looking into that will present ?.
Clinton, if CASA had evidence
(anything other than evidence is hearsay, is it OK to punish an operator on the basis of hearsay ?), why didn't CASA drag them into court and do it properly, you know, using the justice system, instead of the, what was the term: