Old 2nd May 2010, 22:43
  #33 (permalink)  
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Ex-pat Aussie in the UK
Posts: 5,217
So your contention is that it is immoral for the people (represented by the state) to limit your ownership of a firearm, because if you murder someone with that firearm you can then be prosecuted.

Seems fine for everyone but the murdered party then.

(Should point out here, that "you" and "your" means "you who want to own firearms", not any person in particular.)
Checkboard is offline