criss,
I would be interested to know what you think I have posted that is "crap".
That the Tu154 has a poorer safety record than Western types
That the repeated attempts to accomplish a NPA in 500m visibility may have been a major factor
That the crew were under undue pressure to " complete the mission" if they truly made 4 attempts to get in
That if reports are true suggesting the aircraft crashed in a banked attitude it is quite possible the crew saw the lights (perhaps because they busted the minima in a last desparate 4th attempt to please the VIP's) and were trying to convert the offset quite possible on an NPA into a landing , at low altitude in the fog
Which part of the above do you classify as "crap" as opposed to half reasonable assumption?
Whilst some of this is certainly pure conjecture on my part, this particular forum is called "Rumours and News", so to your good self, the earlier now deleted well wisher who so kindly identified me as a muppet (how observant
) and clivewatson, I can only say, use your imagination and professional knowledge and experience (assuming you have any ) and tell me how the suggestions I have made are so flawed then smart @sses.
Oh BTW, JeV could you give us some details of these Rolls Royce powered Tu154,s think we would all like to hear about that mod