Originally Posted by
Stratocaster
As I understand it, legacy carriers intentionally understimated the trouble generated by LCC in the beginning. Legacy carriers thought (i.e. liked to think) that LCC staff would eventually start a mutiny against management, chop their bosses' head off and impose "more decent" contractual terms, thereby putting an end to the LCC business model.
None of this happened apparently because LCC staff is scattered around Europe, and has very different backgrounds and perspectives on what a "decent contract" looks like. Well divided, easily conquered.
Not to mention the fact that Southwest was already very successful and popular among aviation staff across the US. Legacy carriers seem to have been blinded by their own anxiety and wishful thinking.
I don't think any pilot wants to fly for a crappy salary, or to fly more for less cash. But in the games against management either everyone's onboard, or there's no game (i.e. pilots loose).
Perhaps unions should have paid more attention to student pilots and LCC pilots right from the beginning?
Interesting that you mention Southwest. Their pilots make more than any other legacy carrier narrow body pilots in the US, and yes they are unionized. Low cost does not have to mean poverty T & C's for aircrew as SouthWest has been consistantly profitable for more than 30 yrs, a record no other US airline can come close to. The differenace is highly competant mangement with a long term view and keen appreciation of cost vs value, and a workforce that understands they have to be productive. Sadly most legacy carriers seem to lack both...