Pettifogger ;
" .........the AAIB's report to be well researched, well written and comprehensive in scope. I believe that they have reached the right conclusions and have provided sufficient analysis to justify those conclusions. ......."
The report is hardly "comprehensive in scope" as it does not even begin to try to cover representative tests of the presumed actual fuel/water mixture in the plane at the time of the accident.
Likewise their "analysis" is non-existent as they totally dodge this issue.
The report screams out both a lack of rigourous testing and avoidance of the huge cost that would be involved in both undertaking such research and then applying it to ALL airframe and engine combinations.
Releasing a report with such glaring gaps is plain weird.