Olive
1. They judged their own case, in doing so protecting senior officers who had knowingly fabricated the CAR/RTS (in that the act of issuing the documents clearly deceived the Users into thinking the regulations had been followed).
2. It is MoD who deliberately seek to confuse airworthiness and serviceability.
3. If the above officers had not conspired to withhold vital evidence from successive inquiries, the journalists would have had no need to report what is clearly in the public interest.
Evidence should now be re-examined in the light of recent events. In particular, the actions of Controller Aircraft and ACAS, and their staffs, who clearly failed in their duty of care; and those officials who for 15 years have systematically lied to conceal the truth.
At the moment, the only officer in these areas who comes out of this looking good is Capt Brougham RN, who wrote to his superiors in MoD(PE) BEFORE the crash imploring them to take heed of Boscombe's warnings (including "positively dangerous" software implementation and systems integration failures).