Nothing new as far as I know Olive, just the same old outrageous situation that has existed for the last 15 years. As you so rightly remind us, the two reviewing officers based their findings on their opinions. What they based those on is immaterial, insomuch as they did not base them on incontrovertible facts beyond all doubt whatsoever, as they were required to given their finding. I presume that one of the things they did not base their finding on was the fact that the Aircraft's RTS and Airworthiness both lacked all credibility, to say the least.