I haven't read the whole of this topic as I don't have that much free time. Have tried to get through the majority of the 'neutral' information and ignore the 'obviously biassed' where possible. This leads me to the question of how on earth will it be possible to get a 'neutral' jury if this is going to court as a murder trial. From those who have posted on here, I would suggest the majority have a view which is already biassed because of their existing views on hunting.