You seem to be certain that he is guilty. Why then is the union supporting him with his "not guilty" (so to speak) plea?? He has the certificates and exam results to prove that he is licenced to undertake what he does. He is not a fake. You said that the ALEA has contacted CASA about another alledged "fake". Maybe you should have checked their qualifications, making certain that you were on the right path before trying to ruin somebody elses career??