Are you concluding then with no facts that is what happened?
No - read my post(s) - heavily caveated.
They must know with FDR and CVR readouts what happened.
No - not to the standard required of an accident report / investigation. They know what the data says... not
know what and crucially
why, something happened (or not). That takes a lot of analysis and even trick cyclists
Keeping that information secret serves no purpose in the interest of safety.
What purpose does it serve?
Uninformed chattering, wild conclusions, accusations etc. In the press and as shown in the last 94 pages here
It always has been that way (see BA38) - why should this accident be different
NoD