"CX wants 100% pass rate for everything...do you realise how much money it wastes for all teh failures? "
Sorry Numbers, have to disagree. Lets look at the sums if you upgrade from J.F/O to F/O. The difference between the two positions in terms of Pay ? Huge
The difference in productivity? Hmm, cross wind from 10 kts to 15 kts and a bit less vis.
So if we fail a couple of Q.L's ( as is the case more often that not ) where is the smart money?
It is 3 month's between Q.L. check's at lets say 10 J.F/O's vs. 10 F/O salaries.
It is not just failures, lets look at upgrade for S/O's. At the moment the buzz word is " not accertive enough" A substantial number of S/O's have been informed lately that the have to do at least 3 more months as S/O as they are not "accertive enough". This was after reviewing a file of a S/O that do a module every 6 weeks, and after scrutenizing the very subjective ERAS system.
P.S. They only do a couple more sim's, once again there is no remedial help to "become more accertive" Only more S/O modules.
With all respect, you might be a little out of touch with what's happening at the lower levels Numbers