Originally Posted by
mopardave
Does his defence of cognitive impairment not open the door for this "defence" to be trotted out for all sorts of (thinking RTC's) scenario's now? I can't imagine the relatives have some sense of "closure".......more a sense of injustice! His very skilled defence team won........doesn't mean it's the right verdict!
It already happens. Similar "defences" have been used for years, transient physical or medical problems, one-off mechanical defects that can't be traced. It's all part of the legal game.
.