PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - RAF Preference for in line engines vs radials in WW2
Old 25th Nov 2022, 20:11
  #39 (permalink)  
tdracer
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Everett, WA
Age: 68
Posts: 4,390
Received 179 Likes on 87 Posts
Originally Posted by treadigraph
The B-29 used the Wright R3350 which is a two row 18 cylinder engine; as you say the rear row initially proved hard to cool. The B-29 was then developed into the B-50 and C-97, both of which used the P&W R4360 with four rows and 28 cylinders - the "corncob". Also problematic in keeping the backmost rows cool. Did any other four row radial engines see production?
Yea, I stand corrected - apparently most B-29s (and all earlier build) had the two row R3350 engine, with the Pratt R4360 coming along later.
I visited an air museum last year that had a B-29 on display (sort of the crown jewel of their collection). It had the four row R4360 engines (one engine was sitting on a display stand next to the aircraft) - I mistakenly assumed that was the typical configuration.
At any rate, cooling the back row(s) on a big radial engine proved problematic, a problem big, water-cooled engines don't have.
tdracer is offline