Originally Posted by
dr dre
That burned in outback grasslands where nobody lives. We’re talking about record intensity fires in the eucalyptus forest of the populated south east and south west.
Thank you for that
dr dre.
Perhaps yer need tell them climate hysteria fanatics that. Seems they think speed and extent of spread of fire is also ‘intensity’ of fire. Personally, I’d prefer to fight a fast moving low fuel load desert fire then a high fuel load forest fire any day of the week..
Originally Posted by
dr dre
Indigenous cultural burning is not modern hazard reduction burning.
Correct. Though, whats yer point.. ? Being very simplistic, if yer fire fighting in a paddock that has a low fuel load whats it matter how it came to have a low fuel load. (Variance can be a low fuel load via grazing or low fuel load of burnt areas being affected by unburnt ‘nature’ perimeters, etc…)
Originally Posted by
dr dre
No, it’s because a hotter and dryer climate makes hazard reduction burning more dangerous. Go speak to an
actual firefighter.
.
That actual fire fighter you quoted got his job by government hire. Do you think he would be hired if he did not hold the ‘correct’ views?…
Seems when he were talking those ‘correct’ views he were in line for a new job… but now getting the sack:
“…found to be bureaucratic and ineffective, with the agency to be dissolved…”
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resilience_NSW