Originally Posted by
60FltMech
I also think there’s a valid point to be made(that is being made?) that a product that was designed for civil use vs a military application will be quite different. Even though these aircraft won’t be in combat per se, they would ultimately benefit from whichever manufacturing standard produces the most rugged and reliable aircraft for the best price
FltMech
Why would the replacement for (amongst others) the Puma not "be in combat", or have I misunderstood?