Binghi, interesting person to reference this Bryson. From your own link he is said to have held the following positions on climate change:
- The climate is actually cooling because of human impacts on the environment.
- When the evidence proved that he was wrong and the climate was actually warming, Bryson testified to Congress that global warming from fossil-fuel combustion was politically unstoppable.
- He then reversed himself (again) and said the warming was not caused by humans after all.
So a guy who can’t decide if global temperatures are going up or down, nor whether it is effected by humans or not, seems an odd choice for a climate change authority.
You still struggle to see the difference between climatic conditions and Climate Change. Just because it is sunny in the morning and cloudy in the afternoon, that is not what people refer to when discussing Climate Change.
Given you consider MIT professors to be ‘
numpties’ and your personal thought experiments trump NASA analysis then I’m clearly not going to convince you you’re wrong. I won’t waste any more time on this foolish debate.