Originally Posted by
phylosocopter
They are not reputable! Any organisation that runs a headline in the form of ""bull**** unsupported misleading statement" says unnamed expert" has lost sight of their purpose. That headline demonstrates that they do not have a functioning editorial process and should therefore not receive any journalistic "public good" protection in the courts. I hope they get sued into insolvency for that.
Presumably your view applies also to the scurrilous Wall Street Journal, who have also commented on the intentional manoeuvre scenario ?