One might pause to wonder what the point of the process is, though, if the kind of incident the subject of the ATSB report the subject of this thread is 'ops normal' for an operator. And that's my point.
Australian process revolves around mountains of now electronic paperwork, as you know. The applicant just has to say they will do everything right and they get a tick, then practice very different standards and wait for something to go wrong to get the poker. Meanwhile the operational surveillance focuses on whether the FO wore a high vis while visiting the toilet block or the FA spoke verbatim from the 1000 word long boarding spiel that no one listens to (because it's too long).