lederhosen :
But it would be helpful to understand which bit I got wrong ATC Watcher.
Ooops , syntax error , typed too fast. . The comma is missing after "it is not" . I was directly replying to the HKG affirmation that it was absolutely for tax reasons , quoting you as reference... The correct sentence should have read , It is not ( absolutely for that reasons),
comma, as lederhosen explained, etc..
You got nothing wrong ,, sorry for the misunderstanding, will better watch my syntax next time!