Originally Posted by
MickG0105
Yes, whether the Court likes it or not, they are essentially ruling on whether a company can outsource any element their business that has high levels of union membership regardless of whether there would have been a valid commercial reason for doing so.
What a load of ignorant junk. You clearly have zero understanding of the law or just waste your free time manipulating others that have little understanding of the law.
The Justice ruled based on law as its written and was intended. The fact that it doesn’t suit the company narrative or the commercial reasons for the decision are irrelevant.
Australian companies can outsource elements of their business as long as they follow the law and don’t attempt to manipulate and mislead the court. Judges do not like that