There's a danger of heading down the same legal rabbit-hole as the Shoreham display crash thread did. Conviction under criminal law requires guilt to be proven beyond reasonable doubt: a very high bar to cross. I daresay that most people apply a less rigorous test to their personal judgements of other people's character and actions. And why not? I'm sure I'm not alone in wanting to be reasonably sure that my friends are *not* dishonest. That difference in perspective might explain jolihokistix's feelings (which hopefully can set aside now the taker's identity is known?).
Last edited by Easy Street; 9th Aug 2021 at 10:08.