PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - BNA/MNG SFIS info
View Single Post
Old 22nd Jul 2021, 10:27
  #98 (permalink)  
OZBUSDRIVER
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: YMML
Posts: 2,561
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
That did not go ahead because pilots and others believed that self separation in IMC was acceptably safe.
Bloody WRONG...it was called Class G back then-

Executive Summary.

• Government responsibility for CSOs has been captured by proponents of "user pays" and "affordable safety".

The Class G Trials were an example of public policy being captured by sectional interests that included AOPA, ATC Executive Management and Mr. D. Smith.

! Australia has a "World's Best" system of Directed Traffic Information provided by Flight Service.

• Airservices Australia has promoted Airspace 2000 in part as justification for limitations of is expensive TAAATS project.

• The capture of policy making has allowed a section of the aviation community to become an "economic free rider"

• The senior management of CASA have shown themselves to be influenced if not captured by those whom they are to regulate.

• The tr ials were a safety fraud - the Safety Case had flaws in it.

• BASI's recommendation to terminate the trial is to be applauded.

• An airspace bureau within the Department of transport should design airspace, CASA should regulate implementation and management of policy to ensure safety and quality processes,

• Management of airspace should reside with RAAF and Airservices Australia.

• BASI should retain its current independant role as investigator.
OZBUSDRIVER is offline