PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - New Part 91 and oxygen requirements
View Single Post
Old 15th Jul 2021, 06:42
  #41 (permalink)  
roundsounds
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sydney
Age: 62
Posts: 458
Received 21 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Al E. Vator
Dick Smith can you stop being a smart arse when somebody says something different to you.

Actually, if what has been presented above is correct, it does seem logical. There are definite effects of lack of oxygen on some people above 10,000ft (some figure has to be chosen and 10,000 is as good as any). Rather than dictating you MUST wear the gear, it is sensible to have it there under 12,500ft (again another figure has to be chosen) in case its needed.

If I were a legislator I'd probably view that as a sensible concept. Like having a first aid kit available. Hope not to use it but it's there if you need.

Having a portable oxygen bottle on board in no way affects the viability of a business, particularly if the oxygen isn't even needed.

So maybe quit being a snide smartypants and accept others may actually have valid opinions.
If someone disagrees with your opinion and offered theirs, it doesn’t mean they’re a smartarse. Surely we are mature enough to have a robust discussion / debate?
roundsounds is offline