Originally Posted by
kingRB
So makes me wonder what the real story is here? Why is Bridle quoting a study that proves the opposite of what he's claiming?
Because he is completely wrong:
https://byrambridle.com/
Here's a website setup to counter all his incorrect and misleading claims, using scientific research to back each one.
The fact his first and main claim about toxic spike protein in the vaccine spells doom for his credibility, given they don't even exist in mRNA vaccines...
Bridle has also testified against the effectiveness of masks, against lockdowns, and against the "experimental" vaccines (which he reasons are unnecessary with his proposed treatment – ivermectin).
Says it all really - he is clearly awake while all of us sleep..