Originally Posted by
Richard Dangle
No need for this semantical diversion...ORAC has explained perfectly (and provided references).
Bottom line, he was sacked..
There is nothing "diversionary" about the distinction between the two things because, if you review the thread, some are calling into question whether or not Mercer has shown integrity by resigning. It is therefore very germane to the conversation whether being sacked or resigning are the same thing!
I don't have a dog in this fight, but I do believe that both semantic
and pragmatic meaning matters, particularly when someone's integrity and character is being judged.
Bottom line: glad you're happy with ORAC's view point, but please don't seek to tell others what they can and cannot post here.
EDIT: I see now that ORAC has cited Politco. This contradicts the previously cited Guardian. So, we're still no wiser.