PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Final Report: April 2018 737 high speed aborted TO
Old 16th Feb 2021, 09:43
  #129 (permalink)  
Landflap
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exie ; Ours just says "Engine fire" as evidenced by at least two "parameters. It does not talk about the parameters that produce a " warning". Engine failure is a failure and would be clearly evidenced by other control factors that, surely don't need at "least two other parameters". or deep discussion. Up to V1, a "failure" would be pretty obvious. I would not seek a second confirmation to a boot full of rudder.

Drifting a long way off thread though. Someone earlier asked about some thread about calling V1 before V1. There was one. That too drifted a long way off into the hand-bag swinging this is getting close to. We do call V1 at V1 minus 5 kts & even stress the speed, in knots, that the call will be made at.

Kathmandu AIB publication is the thread and I must, finally agree with all the others that, quite simply, rejecting after V1 proved horribly wrong.

Landflap is offline