parkfell, what is the point of this thread ?
An unjustified, unsubstantiated view of individuals, age, experience, or culture; just to make the headlines. Or by introducing a gender debate start a 'meaningless' discussion; unless you seek more 'name in headlines' being one of those who commented in Av Herald.
There are lessons to be learnt from this accident, not necessarily as identified in the final report - an example of a good investigation determining
what happened, but not necessarily
why (limitations of ICAO requirements, particularly for HF).
Points for discussion and learning could start with the preflight organisation 'abnormalities'.
Possibly an influence on what appeared to be a rushed descent - trying to make up time; the lack of pre landing briefing with opportunity to reconsider landing performance, and have a plan from which deviations might be identified by the PM.
The inappropriate responses to EGPWS Alerts and a Pull UP Warning is an HF lesson for everyone - if only the issues could be identified.
Also, another example of the expectation that CRM and Intervention will always identify adverse situations, and that all decisions are expected to be good; and if not then 'more training required'.
Professional discussion of the above could have significant safety benefit - before considering unstable tailwind approaches, fast and long touchdowns.
Final Report
https://www.cao.ir/web/accidents/rep...pjRE9nPT0=.pdf