Originally Posted by
normanton
Depends if it's a long term or short term surplus.
If it's long term (like the 747) why would they offer LWOP? All they are doing is kicking the problem x years down the track. People come back from LWOP and again another surplus. Rinse repeat. At some point the redundancy hammer has to fall (if it happens).
Want protection from it? Take LWOP. You have less than 6 hours to apply.
Don't want protection from it? Remain stood down and accrue annual leave.
May the odds be ever in your favour.
thats nonsensical
id suggest a surplus worth CRing over would be long term and the same consulting/mitigators would be in place for each occasion.
they dont manage a 747 surplus with CR. Its a RIN which may end up with the bottom needing CR or other appropriate measures.