PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Jobs maybe ? B777/A330 crews
View Single Post
Old 29th Jul 2020, 01:25
  #1 (permalink)  
BNEA320
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: BNE
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jobs maybe ? B777/A330 crews

Well the world has changed. Many airlines were struggling before Corona. $800 return fares from all ports in Australia to EU were common. Almost bought TG tickets BNE/BKK/MXP return for school holidays in June 2020. Only catch was connection on way home at BKK, meant overnight.

With the world changing, employment contracts will change as well.

The old way of thinking about employment, may also have to change.

Just received a brief description from a venture capital mate, of a very interesting proposal about a new medium haul airline operation, that needs someone experienced, like maybe a retired airline CEO to help kick start it, using their contacts & more than the funding in place.

Claim was they had AUD$1m in place so far.

Idea is to use parked aircraft & crews to start an ULCC or LCC operation, more like a charter operation, where when demand is high, more flights are operated & when demand low, only few flights or none operated.(remember when Allegiant bought a handful of Mad Dogs for nothing, they didn’t even fly them on Tuesday when demand low)

Obviously not appealing to most business types who want frequency.

Charter ops don’t need a lot of funding, unlike a totally new airline, as run more like a tour operator than an airline.

Example was given of Canada 3000 who were probably the 1st real low cost medium to long haul carrier, who were apparently doing very well up to 10 Sept 2001.

They were the launch airline for the A332 & put 340 Y seats in them, but were looking at going 2 class like Air Transat, before the **** hit the fan on 11 Sept 2001, which obviously killed them, just at a time, when they have taken over a number of smaller Canadian airlines (Royal & Canjet)

They flew to Australia on a scheduled charter basis, whatever that is.

FYI routing with A332s was

YYZ/YVR/HNL/BNE/SYD/AKL/RAR/HNL/YVR/YYZ

&

YYZ/YVR/HNL/RAR/AKL/SYD/BNE/HNL/YVR/YYZ

each week & for example, BNE/YVR was called direct (same aircraft) Fares of AUD$750 return BNE & SYD/YVR were common at a time, when options with other airlines were 2 to 3 times those fares (included checked luggage, free seat selection & basic meals)

The proposal could equally be applied to A330s or B777s. Hundreds of each are parked & their values have plummeted. Some will never fly again. Evan spare parts costs must have plummeted.

Example given was of Nok Scoot B772s, of which they had 7, 2 are parked at ASP.

They had 415 seats (24 + 391)

Owned by SQ, they could be back on SQ register if SQ wanted very quickly, if they needed to be taken off the Thai register.

Seems there are quite a few B777 crews sitting idle.

Can a B773 crew fly a B772 with little training ?

The proposal suggested that SQ be convinced that there was some money to be made, in a LCC or ULCC type operation & they would provide aircraft at very low lease rates or take equity or both, with no long term commitment. Not the same as Scoot, but similar.

SQ 777 crews could be used, but if operation was to be truly low cost, Nok Scoot crews could be used, although if ex VA crews would be prepared to work part time, keeping their currency, until economy recovers in a few years, they would be obvious choice, if flying from Australia. VA crews would probably need to be employed by SQ, on some sort of part time basis.

The young love LCCs, as most would rather spend their limited dollars at their destination, not getting there.

Possible routes were suggested, Australia & NZ/North America via a tech stop. Tech stop could be one of a number of Pacific nations who would jump at chance of having nonstop flights to Aust/NZ/North America & would have traffic rights, so the tech stop could also be a destination.

Crews would need to spend some time at that Pacific nation, but some could probably be based in Australia.

North America could mean Canada (YVR but probably low cost Abbotsford instead), maybe 2ndary airports in USA (OAK or ONT) or Mexico (TIJ).

TIJ is a special case, being right on the USA border. Via www.crossborderxpress.com aircraft can land in Mexico & passengers can simply walk across U.S. border with their luggage (100 m was quoted) to San Diego for a small fee. Fee depends on numbers of pax at one time but probably USD$10 each way (sure beats the very time consuming, land crossing) & also means attractive to San Diego residence would normally drive/transfer the 2 hours to LAX to get anwyhere long haul, although you could fly SAN/HNL.

Most travel agents know, but don’t tell, that it’s almost always cheaper to get separate tickets, (if going to Canada or USA beyond LAX or SFO), to LAX or SFO & then from SFO or LAX to final destination. Guess there might be more commission in it for travel agents, to have all flights on one ticket & less hassles if inbound flight to LAX or SFO is late & trying to connect on separate ticket with 3 hours connection.

Many people in the know, do this & then use frequent flyer points to their final destination.

So idea seems to make sense.

Funding could be in the form of prepurchase of tickets. This already goes on, with most airlines & tour operators.

Seems most legacy carriers would love to reduce costs now, to that similar to LCCs but can't due to existing EBAs & unions.

Hardest parts seems to be, when to commence ops.

Be interesting to hear some comments.
BNEA320 is offline