Originally Posted by
wondering
The same is true for the 787. It almost always ends up fast/high at lower altitudes when descending in VNAV. Could it be that using speedbrakes at lower altitudes is overall more efficient than descending earlier and not using speedbrakes at lower altitudes? Thatīs what one of my colleagues is suspecting.
I find it very interesting thought.
As far as I know Boeing/Honeywell doesn't disclose any models including coefficients variables.
I really want to ask about the calculation formula FMS is using to someone from Honeywell or Boeing.
Does someone in this community know anything about the logic VNAV is using?